Rahmat Wibowo accused PT Nomnie Technologies Indonesia and CEO Shahrooz Chowdhury of unlawful termination, forfeited referral commissions, and labor-law violations, framing the dispute through a multi-persona panel that branded the company's defenses logical fallacies and detailed catastrophic legal and security exposures.

Rahmat Wibowo vs. -:- PT Nomnie Technologies Indonesia Nomni.Al Formerly Liven.love Rahmat Wibowo Grotiow >) Panel Final Verdict AEGIS composite assessment across 4 expert personas Systemic Violations and Wasted Human Capital Subject Profiles Technical and corporate profile comparison =r GLOBAL CELLEN' LEADERSHIP AWARDS —— RAHMAT WIBOWO ‘VISIONARY I & DIGITAL 210 associated members & fo) PT Nomnle Technologies indonesia Evidence Gallery — Nomni.Al Shatrooe Chowdhury Shahrooz Chowdhury Govrounger& 0-080 @ Unen | Me a ing row Education University of Sydney Bochelor of Commerce, Fiance, Accounting & Marketing Majors Putting Hospitality 2) usHI UBL Pan tbreadtop C006 @irpuno {AMKUE 2 @ KI: Orr Poi @ wrechi otas a-~ 6 @ Rahmat Wibowo RAHMAT WIBOWO GE Education Meet us at World Al Show Indonesia 2026 C-Suite Multi-Persona Analysis Four independent adversarial reviews CTO — Engineering Rigor 3.0 / 10 Engineering Suicide Assessment Terminating a P1-delivering Senior DevOps within 21 days is talent density waste of the highest order Forced unmonitored data purge prevents knowledge transfer and creates severe architectural blindspots 219-person org couldn't build what one engineer built — leadership cannot recognize elite talent No consolidated observability framework leaves Nomni blind to API gateway and DB lockout failures CEO — Business Strategy 1.8 / 10 Commercial Trust Destruction CEO Shaz induced Rahmat to decline competing offers via "3 years = 10 years elsewhere" promise — violated in 21 days Canceling referral commissions post- termination converts a talent channel into a legal liability Non-lawyer bipartite reps + UU ITE threats exposes VC backers (Living Lab, Carbide) to public scrutiny Heat score 49 18 pts, CB Rank 33,105 — employer brand poisoning actively destroying market position CRO — Chief Risk Officer 1.2 /10 Catastrophic Legal Exposure 5 working days notice vs. PP 35/2021 Pasal 37(4) mandated 7 — notice is void by operation of law No mTLS or tenant-scoped caching > heavy UU PDP 2022 corporate fine exposure Signed Berita Acara deadlock now in public Disnakertrans record — PHI litigation eligible Non-lawyer bipartite representation making binding statutory interpretations — legal malpractice risk Advanced Hacker — Security 2.0 / 10 Hostile Offboarding = Critical Attack Surface Abrupt severance of a deep- architecture-aware DevOps without proper handoff is textbook insider threat setup No mTLS or strict origin validation on transaction APIs — standard public endpoint vulnerability Vercel env vars as primary secrets store instead of HSM/KMS is a critical credential exposure risk Forced data deletion under duress is itself a security anti-pattern — no integrity verification possible Claims Matrix — Panel Verdicts Rahmat's claims vs. Nomni's defenses, adjudicated Nomni.Al's Logical Fallacies Four core fallacies deployed during bipartite session Fallacy 1 — Shadow Category ("It's not PHK, it's just probation ending") Manufacturing an employment classification that does not exist in Indonesian labor law. Every termination of a PKWTT contract — whether under probation or not — is legally a PHK under Indonesian law. Fallacy 2 — False Equivalence ("Referral work is like cleaning someone's car") Claiming Rahmat's referral of 50+ candidates was a "voluntary favor." Nomni operates a structured referral system, actively processed the candidates, and gained measurable hiring database assets from the submissions. Fallacy 3 — Onboarding Deniability ("Pre- contract work was personal initiative") Arguing work delivered before April 1st carries no corporate obligation — ignoring the fact they added Rahmat to their Slack, internal corporate infrastructure, and systems before the start date: a de facto onboarding act. Fallacy 4 — Defamation Scarecrow ("We're being merciful by not filing UU ITE") Threatening criminal defamation for documenting a civil labor dispute. Filing bipartite claims and sharing factual records is a protected constitutional right under Indonesian law. Attempting to suppress a civil claim with criminal threats is legal desperation. Risk Matrix & Risk Register Outstanding legal and financial exposures facing Nomni Risk ID 01 — Class PO PHI Litigation Escalation Bipartite deadlock is now in public Disnakertrans record. Dispute eligible for Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI) litigation. Retroactive salary compensation required for notice shortfall. Probal : 80% Impact: HIGH Risk ID 02 — Class P1 Forfeited Referral Commissions 50+ candidates processed through official hiring pipeline. Commission claim: IDR 100,000,000. KUH Perdata 1365 — completed variable work cannot be retroactively forfeited. Probability: HIGH Amount: IDR 100M Risk ID 03 — Class P1 UU PDP Violation / VC Brand Damage No mTLS or tenant-scoped caching > data exposure liability under UU PDP 2022. Misconduct exposure directly to Living Lab Ventures and Carbide Ventures could trigger governance review. Probability: 75% Impact: SEVERE The 1vs 219 Asymmetry . aN Professional... (C+ Subscribe 401 followers 04